Casimir effect due to a single boundary as a manifestation of the Weyl problem
Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, ISSN: 1751-8113, Vol: 43, Issue: 38
2010
- 5Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The Casimir self-energy of a boundary is ultraviolet-divergent. In many cases, the divergences can be eliminated by methods such as zeta-function regularization or through physical arguments (ultraviolet transparency of the boundary would provide a cutoff). Using the example of a massless scalar field theory with a single Dirichlet boundary, we explore the relationship between such approaches, with the goal of better understanding of the origin of the divergences. We are guided by the insight due to Dowker and Kennedy (1978 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 11 895) and Deutsch and Candelas (1979 Phys. Rev. D 20 3063) that the divergences represent measurable effects that can be interpreted with the aid of the theory of the asymptotic distribution of eigenvalues of the Laplacian discussed by Weyl. In many cases, the Casimir self-energy is the sum of cutoff-dependent (Weyl) terms having a geometrical origin, and an 'intrinsic' term that is independent of the cutoff. The Weyl terms make a measurable contribution to the physical situation even when regularization methods succeed in isolating the intrinsic part. Regularization methods fail when the Weyl terms and intrinsic parts of the Casimir effect cannot be clearly separated. Specifically, we demonstrate that the Casimir self-energy of a smooth boundary in two dimensions is a sum of two Weyl terms (exhibiting quadratic and logarithmic cutoff dependence), a geometrical term that is independent of cutoff and a non-geometrical intrinsic term. As by-products, we resolve the puzzle of the divergent Casimir force on a ring and correct the sign of the coefficient of linear tension of the Dirichlet line predicted in earlier treatments. © 2010 IOP Publishing Ltd.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=78649552830&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/43/38/385402; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1751-8113/43/38/385402; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/43/38/385402; https://validate.perfdrive.com/fb803c746e9148689b3984a31fccd902/?ssa=1914f03c-b85e-49ec-8bab-3ad66bf131d7&ssb=22887270197&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1751-8113%2F43%2F38%2F385402&ssi=de2548e1-8427-4f19-9305-efd4a17b77e5&ssk=support@shieldsquare.com&ssm=30639940662891926471972575810070459&ssn=dc79478258ebf276271bf90be1326c3641f617f9ea44-4e1f-4e35-bc2832&sso=1e32715e-f9d9f87a371ffcece169c83cd5efe3b4ac960e5d6ec3be99&ssp=84788804141719373263171960853011538&ssq=29505510977622301868405699918622917330792&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBjMGI2MzM1NC00OGRkLTRjNTUtODVmZS00NzZmMjgxYzE5ZDgxNzE5MzA1Njk5NDA1MzA0MDc3MzEyLWYwM2IwNjlhZGVkYWQ5Nzg0NzE5NCIsInV6bXgiOiI3ZjkwMDAxZTFhNWQwZC1iNGU2LTRlNDQtYWZhOC03NTExMWZmODRkOWY0LTE3MTkzMDU2OTk0MDUzMDQwNzczMTItOTZlOTI0ZDMzZjY1NjdhZTQ3MTk0IiwicmQiOiJpb3Aub3JnIn0=
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know