On the adiabatic approximation for the laser-dressed atom
Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, ISSN: 1751-8121, Vol: 56, Issue: 50
2023
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The adiabatic approximation is analyzed for non-perturbative interaction of an atomic system with an intense low-frequency laser field. We find that the well-known adiabatic ansatz, which consists in using the DC-based Green’s and wave functions for an atom in the instantaneous AC field to calculate transition matrix elements, exceeds the level of accuracy of the adiabatic approximation and requires further theoretical revision. It is shown that the non-analyticity in the field strength of the DC-based Green’s and wave functions leads to violation of the adiabaticity constrains and the appearance of rapidly oscillating components in the transition matrix elements. We suggest an improved adiabatic approach utilizing the analytical parts in the DC-based Green’s and wave functions. We illustrate our revised adiabatic approach for analysis of atomic polarizability in two-component laser field with an intense infrared and perturbative extreme ultraviolet components within the zero-range potential model.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85180073957&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ad0dc8; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1751-8121/ad0dc8; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/ad0dc8; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=78086dd0-ce08-44fd-9c2b-dc261d6b1694&ssb=73671267426&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1751-8121%2Fad0dc8&ssi=3e8ac4c2-cnvj-45d3-8f71-f082afcaf979&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=4236044516586356882607325784214563&ssn=bfb7a4757a18d1b2f19b2962aae2ea09f3e411e4fc9b-fb87-4f4d-98d833&sso=8fdea121-2d7afa72fb70aa42e0f9328bf2a9e9dc6e2b198babe1ffee&ssp=16943778771727284411172744191266455&ssq=40353765409341421677789217175467271245752&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDA3ZjU2ZDllYi00NDg4LTQyYmYtYjIyMS0wOWNmOTJkYjU2MmQxNzI3Mjg5MjE3MzMwMTY0ODc2MDEzLTU4OGJlM2I0MmRiOTYwMmM4MjYwIiwicmQiOiJpb3Aub3JnIiwidXpteCI6IjdmOTAwMDU1Zjg5OGNmLWFmZTktNGE4Yy1iMWYxLWVhZjgxNzE0NTczNzMtMTcyNzI4OTIxNzMzMDE2NDg3NjAxMy03YzBkMGJlYWRiOTI3M2M5ODI2MCJ9
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know