Coastlines estimation and erosion rate assessment in Tuba Island, Langkawi using remotely-sensed digital imageries analysis
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, ISSN: 1755-1315, Vol: 1240, Issue: 1
2023
- 9Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures9
- Readers9
Conference Paper Description
Malaysia's coastline is constantly exposed to ocean threats, resulting in coastal erosion and sea-level rise. Pulau Tuba's is a part of Pulau Langkawi which known as a popular tourist destination in Malaysia. This study focuses on using remote sensing and Geographical Information System (GIS) tools to examine changes along the coastline of Pulau Tuba, Langkawi, during a six-year period. In this research, changes to the coastline were analyzed using Sentinel-2 imagery from 2016 to 2021, as a result of the comparison of coastline extraction methods. Coastline extraction methods used in this study include 3x3-5x5 and 7x7 edge detection filtering techniques. Image classifier of Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) were also used to quantify the estimated coastlines length. Digital Shoreline Analysis System (DSAS) was used to calculate coastline erosion rate from Sentinel-2 images. The comparison between method to extract coastline revealed that the best window size of edge detection image filtering method is 7x7 and SVM outperform MLC classifier. The erosion rate as estimated from DSAS statistical calculation also highlighted that come parts along the Pulau Tuba coastlines experiencing alarming rate of coastal erosion. The authority needs to plan for soft and hard structure to mitigate the impact of coastal erosion in the future.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85174245946&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1240/1/012018; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/1240/1/012018; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1240/1/012018; https://validate.perfdrive.com/fb803c746e9148689b3984a31fccd902/?ssa=49a73c04-070d-43f9-8d80-a95bb510ec02&ssb=62371260553&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1755-1315%2F1240%2F1%2F012018&ssi=43c91b75-8427-46a3-a8b2-440df9bfd812&ssk=support@shieldsquare.com&ssm=0801789479425433631607797586795084&ssn=04656340761ad18a758a6ba93eb6e49c3bb11d717baf-41c9-4be8-b08069&sso=594062e5-8edfa45a353407ad8bd9fe7c13d71a7003b52427b335f7ea&ssp=50841719761722442070172250475701830&ssq=52937911267718780069649886976254074111582&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBhYzc1Mjc3MS00NDY5LTQ1YzEtYjIyZC01ZTMxN2I4YmJmMzUxNzIyNDQ5ODg2MzE1NjI3OTEzMTgtNDZlNWQxMTE0MTA1ZDQzNzMxNjAiLCJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwNjBhYjM4MDQtMjgyMi00ODE2LTljOGQtMDM2ZThjYzNlOTMyMi0xNzIyNDQ5ODg2MzE1NjI3OTEzMTgtNTQxMTI0ZTRkMjJjOTUxZjMxNjAifQ==
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know