Perspective of senior citizens regarding intersectional equity on walkability
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, ISSN: 1755-1315, Vol: 1294, Issue: 1
2024
- 21Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures21
- Readers21
- 21
Conference Paper Description
With the current trend of exploring walkability measures using objective approach, it is essential not to overlook subjective perspectives. Intersectionality examines how heterogenous members of a specific group might have different experiences depending on several aspects of their identities, including gender, age, sexuality, ethnicity, religion, and other social factors. This study explores the influence of age on walkability perceptions, revealing that senior citizens have distinct perspectives on this matter compared to the average population. The study involved 392 senior citizens who rated various variables affecting their walkability. These ratings were then analyzed using Random Forest Classifier to identify key variables that predict their willingness to walk. The findings indicate that walkability is positively associated with senior citizens' willingness to walk when certain variables are present, such as adequate lighting, evenness of pedestrian walks, short travel time to recreational facilities, availability of benches or resting spaces, the presence of family or friends during walks, the presence of security officers, availability of pedestrian walks, and the availability of social activities and gatherings. This study contributes to the understanding of intersectional equity in pedestrian facilities and provides considerations to its future development by including the perspective of senior age individuals.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85185772932&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1294/1/012023; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/1294/1/012023; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1294/1/012023; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=868e64bf-efb6-469c-ba93-87a092553973&ssb=86473205165&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1755-1315%2F1294%2F1%2F012023&ssi=c0939af3-cnvj-456f-baf1-dc18c50798fe&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=157103115548818041653526829326946939&ssn=7edde91e39b4b3cc59c08378fcd2eaf788e7e3e449d9-548a-4c5b-940296&sso=46909caf-f497241c935f16890b771252e589b804efee1ff3b86a44ef&ssp=78421497151732109871173299566855753&ssq=85614146228130825956426405364135120428571&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwZWUyZGRiODMtZjY4Ny00ZGY4LTliMTMtNDQ0OWIzZDhjZjczMTEtMTczMjEyNjQwNTI2NjgzNTg3NTkwOC0wMzc2MDg0NGNlOTFkMzg5MTY1MzI1IiwicmQiOiJpb3Aub3JnIiwiX191em1mIjoiN2Y2MDAwMmU0NDlkM2ItMDIzYi00NzI2LWIyOGEtZDQ0NTE5NTc2YTQ1MTczMjEyNjQwNTI2NjgzNTg3NTkwOC1kZTg1YTlmZDQ4OGY3MGMxMTY1MzMxIn0=
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know