Probabilistic seismic demand model for regular bridges based on the modified Park-Ang damage index
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, ISSN: 1755-1315, Vol: 218, Issue: 1
2019
- 1Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
In this paper, a modified damage model is established to solve the non-convergence problem existing in the Park-Ang damage index. The scatter of the modified damage index is significantly reduced compared to the original Park-Ang damage index. Then the finite element analysis models of 8 representative regular bridges samples were established with the main parameters variable such as the column height. The total 19120 increment dynamic analysis (IDA) curves were obtained by using the IDA method. These IDA curves are expressed in terms of one intensity measure (IM), i.e., the spectral acceleration at the fundamental period with 5% damping, and one engineering demand parameter (EDP), i.e., the modified Park-Ang damage index. At last, the probabilistic seismic demand model of regular bridges was established by using probability analysis based on the result of IDA curves. It is found that the seismic damage demand is reasonably standard beta distributed at given IM levels. The quadratic equation is suitable to establish the correlation between the mean value of the seismic damage demad and the IM. It is concluded that the established probabilistic seismic demand model is suitable for 3different site conditions and can largely simplify the computational effort of seismic demand in the performance-based seismic design and assessment of regular bridges.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85063383827&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/218/1/012084; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/218/1/012084; http://stacks.iop.org/1755-1315/218/i=1/a=012084/pdf; http://stacks.iop.org/1755-1315/218/i=1/a=012084?key=crossref.465c0139c79044e158ac17587d337acf; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/218/1/012084; https://validate.perfdrive.com/9730847aceed30627ebd520e46ee70b2/?ssa=bdfb6c95-96e5-4f83-b313-ac71764bbda5&ssb=74114271238&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F1755-1315%2F218%2F1%2F012084&ssi=e943e73c-cnvj-4740-bb5a-06aa20103d5f&ssk=botmanager_support@radware.com&ssm=393266269959467338237680741552075641&ssn=629955d3c2c2919002be7694a139a593e92c0900c3c4-8990-4f21-a2f1df&sso=40674f8c-bc564dd29dea85d8d2e6d9037db2b7b1d9ac70eec6180975&ssp=66049539271726506068172718480677070&ssq=22629700176357667631129239042742728337554&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwMGMxZDc2YmItMzk2MS00N2VjLTlkZGItNjdmYTVhZTY2ODdlOC0xNzI2NTI5MjM5NDUzNTcyNTIzNzA5LWM4ZmQwMjU2ZDk3NjA0NTQ4MjM0ODMiLCJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBkNzYzNGE3Ni05ZTRkLTRjMmMtYjJhMC1mYzAzNGMyZjE1MjkxNzI2NTI5MjM5NDUzNTcyNTIzNzA5LWM3NGRiODRhYjg2ZTllZTM4MjM1NzAifQ==
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know