Characterization of a composite polylactic acid-hydroxyapatite 3D-printing filament for bone-regeneration
Biomedical Physics and Engineering Express, ISSN: 2057-1976, Vol: 7, Issue: 2, Page: 025007
2020
- 26Citations
- 142Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations26
- Citation Indexes26
- 26
- CrossRef5
- Captures142
- Readers142
- 142
Article Description
Autologous cancellous-bone grafts are the current gold standard for therapeutic interventions in which bone-regeneration is desired. The main limitations of these implants are the need for a secondary surgical site, creating a wound on the patient, the limited availability of harvest-safe bone, and the lack of structural integrity of the grafts. Synthetic, resorbable, bone-regeneration materials could pose a viable treatment alternative, that could be implemented through 3D-printing. We present here the development of a polylactic acid-hydroxyapatite (PLA-HAp) composite that can be processed through a commercial-grade 3D-printer. We have shown that this material could be a viable option for the development of therapeutic implants for bone regeneration. Biocompatibility in vitro was demonstrated through cell viability studies using the osteoblastic MG63 cell-line, and we have also provided evidence that the presence of HAp in the polymer matrix enhances cell attachment and osteogenicity of the material. We have also provided guidelines for the optimal PLA-HAp ratio for this application, as well as further characterisation of the mechanical and thermal properties of the composite. This study encompasses the base for further research on the possibilities and safety of 3D-printable, polymer-based, resorbable composites for bone regeneration.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85082529239&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ab73f8; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33438633; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2057-1976/ab73f8; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ab73f8; https://validate.perfdrive.com/fb803c746e9148689b3984a31fccd902/?ssa=b23b8a8d-e0a4-4cd5-853c-48aab29ecc1b&ssb=18038290615&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F2057-1976%2Fab73f8&ssi=a60932a3-8427-4b2d-8eb8-51098ea1680d&ssk=support@shieldsquare.com&ssm=03198350013408247145001638495779016&ssn=96545ac552827b23c9744c2026c9f433516417f9ea44-4e1f-4e35-bd7c86&sso=408b715e-f9d9f87a371f12915f466184804b9601673b1c81c966e96b&ssp=23202036521719348744171944912825335&ssq=01522949971710655409005699572924895361943&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBjMGI2MzM1NC00OGRkLTRjNTUtODVmZS00NzZmMjgxYzE5ZDgxNzE5MzA1Njk5NDA1MTk0MDE4MjY0LTNmMjM0ZjMxNzBiYjYyNWMxNDUwMCIsInJkIjoiaW9wLm9yZyIsInV6bXgiOiI3ZjkwMDAxZTFhNWQwZC1iNGU2LTRlNDQtYWZhOC03NTExMWZmODRkOWYzLTE3MTkzMDU2OTk0MDUxOTQwMTgyNjQtZWIzMTZjOTJjZjZlZmMyYzE0NTAwIn0=
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know