Optimizing bearing health condition monitoring: exploring correlation feature selection algorithm
Engineering Research Express, ISSN: 2631-8695, Vol: 6, Issue: 2
2024
- 4Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures4
- Readers4
Article Description
Vibration signals are a critical source of information for detecting and diagnosing bearing faults, making this research particularly relevant to the condition monitoring of industrial machinery, particularly bearings using vibration signals. This study delves into how feature selection can be done using Pearson’s Correlation Co-efficient within the context of monitoring bearing health conditions, utilizing two distinct approaches. Approach-1 involves feature selection without considering labels, while Approach-2 incorporates labels for feature selection. Comparative analysis is conducted against outcomes obtained when all features are selected. The research scrutinizes the impact of feature selection on classifier performance, accuracy, and execution times, utilizing various machine learning algorithms such as Decision Tree (DT), K Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Naïve Bayes (NB). The findings underscore that feature selection significantly enhances classifier accuracy while reducing execution times. Specifically, only DT and KNN with 50 neighbors achieved 100% accuracy when all features were considered. However, with feature selection using Approach-1 (without labels), DT, KNN, SVM (excluding 100 neighbors), and NB (with Normal/Gaussian kernel) attained 100% accuracy. Employing Approach-2 (with labeled features), DT with 0.7 and 0.9 thresholds, SVM-G with all thresholds (0.6, 0.7, and 0.9), KNN with all thresholds (except 100 neighbors), and NB-n (with all thresholds) achieved 100% accuracy. The study emphasizes the pivotal role of feature selection using Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient in enhancing machine learning classifier performance, offering promising avenues for future research and practical applications across diverse domains.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85190949751&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ad3380; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2631-8695/ad3380; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ad3380; https://validate.perfdrive.com/fb803c746e9148689b3984a31fccd902/captcha?ssa=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F2631-8695%2Fad3380&ssb=f75172ed495931d7132ef501cae1865bde415855&ssc=MDI3MDQ5ZTAzYjcxLTcyNDgtZjNlNC03NDRiLWRhYzdkOTUy
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know