Performance evaluation of ruthenium complexes and organic sensitizers in ZnO-based dye-sensitized solar cells
Engineering Research Express, ISSN: 2631-8695, Vol: 6, Issue: 2
2024
- 2Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
Ruthenium (Ru) dyes are a well-known player in the field of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) due to their high efficiency and excellent stability. Their properties and complexes have been studied for almost three decades. Although these sensitizers show better performances, their high cost makes these third-generation solar devices less economical. Organic dyes have recently been explored as an alternative to Ru-based dyes due to their easy and low-cost synthesis. A comparative performance evaluation of Ru complexes and dicyanoisophorone and rhodanine organic dyes in ZnO-based DSSCs is here reported. All the Ru complexes showed better performance in comparison to organic dyes except R-4. Among the Ru sensitizers, R-3 exhibited the highest efficiency of 1.21% followed by R-2, which is attributed to the presence of several anchoring groups such as carboxyl, nitro and amine. However, the presence of more nitrogen-based groups has drastically reduced the performance as observed for R-4, which is the least performing dye among the Ru-based ones. On the contrary, organic sensitizers S-06 and P-4 revealed to be less efficient with respect to R-3 owing to the presence of only one anchoring group and weak photoanode/dye interaction.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85197457000&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ad5787; https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2631-8695/ad5787; https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ad5787; https://validate.perfdrive.com/fb803c746e9148689b3984a31fccd902/?ssa=ec2817ac-e17f-4233-9e10-0fdecf07cbdc&ssb=72014283251&ssc=https%3A%2F%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F2631-8695%2Fad5787&ssi=c3d6de53-8427-4f7d-90ea-2169f7fc2d5f&ssk=support@shieldsquare.com&ssm=385651442671606871323763495603500646&ssn=b68f5626baea68a28f055500e90e93b7aa99a842bdc0-9b7b-4e59-bfafdd&sso=fbf070fa-9e3578620ac43a1cad1ddc537b84fd2cc2e8ebd79d1f7e38&ssp=12810759151719961119172055630623067&ssq=37382728116445501376841132608239137559085&ssr=NTIuMy4yMTcuMjU0&sst=com.plumanalytics&ssu=&ssv=&ssw=&ssx=eyJfX3V6bWYiOiI3ZjYwMDBiM2EzMDFlNy1mMjVlLTRkMzktOTQ0Yi1hYjlhOGY0NDkwYzYxNzE5OTQxMTMyNTY0NjQwMDMyMjMwLTVjYTA2Y2Q0MjdlODdhNDAxMzIzNzAiLCJyZCI6ImlvcC5vcmciLCJ1em14IjoiN2Y5MDAwZWQ3OGYyMmMtODkyYi00NTZhLWFmZTItMzg4OWE4YzkyNDE0OS0xNzE5OTQxMTMyNTY0NjQwMDMyMjMwLWRmZTZhYjY1NDA3MWY0MjQxMzIzNzAifQ==
IOP Publishing
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know