Essential fat requirements of preterm infants 1 2 3
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, ISSN: 0002-9165, Vol: 71, Issue: 1, Page: 245S-250S
2000
- 73Citations
- 56Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations73
- Citation Indexes73
- 73
- CrossRef55
- Captures56
- Readers56
- 56
Article Description
The interest in factors that modify early infant development has led investigators to focus on n−3 and n−6 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFAs) in the past 2 decades. The presence of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (AA) in breast milk, compared with their absence from infant formulas available in the United States, has prompted clinical trials designed to examine whether LCPUFA enrichment of infant formula has beneficial effects on maturational events of the visual system. These trials have shown significant functional advantages of LCPUFA supplementation for preterm infants, whereas benefits for full-term infants remain controversial. The growth and safety of preterm infants was not compromised by LCPUFA enrichment, although these issues remain to be resolved in clinical trials with full-term infants.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000291652306968X; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/71.1.245s; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0033972081&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10617979; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S000291652306968X; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/71.1.245s
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know