PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Association of nut consumption with risk of total cancer and 5 specific cancers: evidence from 3 large prospective cohort studies

The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, ISSN: 0002-9165, Vol: 114, Issue: 6, Page: 1925-1935
2021
  • 10
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 36
    Captures
  • 1
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    10
  • Captures
    36
  • Mentions
    1
    • Blog Mentions
      1
      • Blog
        1

Most Recent Blog

Industry-influenced (and not influenced) studies of the week: nuts

Two studies of the role of nuts in health. I.  This one comes from ObesityandEnergetics.org’s “Headline vs. Study.” Headline: Maximum Wellness: Walnuts are a Life-Extension Food:  “Looks like your [sic] nuts not to include walnuts in your diet. For more information and to read this study…go to maxwellnutrition.com, where you can find top wellness and nutrition products made in the United States –

Article Description

The associations between nut consumption and cancer risk have not been extensively investigated. We aimed to examine the associations between nut consumption, especially specific types of nuts (peanut, tree nut, walnut, and tree nut other than walnut), and cancer risk. Nut consumption was assessed by FFQ at baseline and updated every 2–4 y in the Nurses’ Health Study (1980–2014), the Nurses’ Health Study II (1991–2015), and the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1986–2018). We examined the associations between the intake of total and specific types of nuts and risk of total cancer and common cancers, including lung, colorectal, breast, bladder, and aggressive prostate cancer. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to obtain the HRs and 95% CIs in each cohort as well as pooled. During 5,873,671 person-years of follow-up in 180,832 women and 45,560 men, we documented 44,561 incident cancer cases. As compared with nonconsumers, the pooled multivariable HRs of total nut consumption for ≥5 times/wk were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.94, 1.04; P -trend = 0.54) for total cancer, 0.88 (95% CI: 0.74, 1.04; P -trend = 0.18) for lung cancer, 1.07 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.26; P -trend = 0.89) for colorectal cancer, 0.90 (95% CI: 0.71, 1.14; P -trend = 0.65) for bladder cancer, 0.96 (95% CI: 0.85, 1.08; P -trend = 0.36) for breast cancer, and 1.18 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.51; P -trend = 0.52) for aggressive prostate cancer In 3 large prospective cohorts, frequent nut consumption was not associated with risk of total cancer and common individual cancers.

Bibliographic Details

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know