Improving documentation of blood product administration using a standardized electronic health record-based system: a single-institution experience
American Journal of Clinical Pathology, ISSN: 1943-7722, Vol: 160, Issue: 3, Page: 268-275
2023
- 1Citations
- 15Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- Captures15
- Readers15
- 15
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Findings from Mount Sinai Medical Center Has Provided New Data on Blood Transfusion (Improving Documentation of Blood Product Administration Using a Standardized Electronic Health Record-based System: a Single-institution Experience)
2023 JUN 19 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Information Technology Daily -- Researchers detail new data in Transfusion Medicine - Blood
Article Description
Objectives: To improve documentation of blood product administration by assessing the completion status of blood transfusions. In this way, we can ensure compliance with the Association for the Advancement of Blood & Biotherapies standards and facilitate investigation of potential blood transfusion reactions. Methods: This before-and-after study includes the implementation of an electronic health record (EHR)-based, standardized protocol for documenting the completion of blood product administration. Twenty-four months of retrospective data (January-December 2021) and prospective data (January-December 2022) were collected. Meetings were held before the intervention. Ongoing daily, weekly, and monthly reports were prepared, and targeted education to deficient areas as well as spot in-person audits by the blood bank residents were conducted. Results: During 2022, 8,342 blood products were transfused, of which 6,358 blood product administrations were documented. The overall percentage of completed transfusion order documentation improved from 35.54% (units/units) in 2021 to 76.22% (units/units) in 2022. Conclusions: Interdisciplinary collaborative efforts helped produce quality audits to improve the documentation of blood product transfusion through a standardized and customized EHR-based blood product administration module.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85169504204&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqad049; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37186872; https://academic.oup.com/ajcp/article/160/3/268/7163155; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqad049; https://academic.oup.com/ajcp/article-abstract/160/3/268/7163155?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know