Phase II study on lapatinib in advanced EGFR-positive chordoma †
Annals of Oncology, ISSN: 0923-7534, Vol: 24, Issue: 7, Page: 1931-1936
2013
- 127Citations
- 77Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations127
- Citation Indexes126
- 126
- CrossRef83
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures77
- Readers77
- 77
- Mentions1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Article Description
To report on a prospective, investigator-driven, phase II study on lapatinib in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive advanced chordoma patients. From December 2009 to January 2012, 18 advanced progressing chordoma patients entered this study (median age: 61 years; disease extent: metastatic 72% and locally advanced 28%). Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression and activation were evaluated by immunohistochemistry and/or phospho-arrays, real-time polimerase chain reaction, fluorescence immunostaining. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis was also carried out. Patients received lapatinib 1500 mg/day (mean dose intensity = 1282 mg/day), until progression or toxicity. The primary study end point was response rate (RR) as per Choi criteria. Secondary end points were RR by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST), overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS) and clinical benefit rate (CBR; RECIST complete response + partial response (PR) + stable disease (SD) ≥ 6 months). All patients were evaluable for response. Six (33.3%) patients had PR and 7 (38.9%) SD, as their best Choi responses, corresponding to RECIST SD in all cases. Median PFS by Choi was 6 [interquartile (IQ) range 3–8] months. Median PFS by RECIST was 8 (IQ range 4–12) months, with a 22% CBR. This phase II study showed a modest antitumor activity of lapatinib in chordoma. The clinical exploitation of EGFR targeting in chordoma needs to be further investigated, both clinically and preclinically. Clinical trial Registration No: EU Clinical Trials Register trial no. 2009-014456-29.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923753419366591; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt117; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84883773689&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23559153; http://f1000.com/prime/reports/reviews/793478177; http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.717997098.793478177; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0923753419366591; https://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.717997098.793478177; https://facultyopinions.com/prime/reports/reviews/793478177; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt117; http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/doi/10.1093/annonc/mdt117; https://www.journals.elsevier.com/annals-of-oncology; https://f1000.com/prime/reports/reviews/793478177; https://academic.oup.com/annonc/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/annonc/mdt117; https://academic.oup.com/annonc/article-pdf/24/7/1931/13789519/mdt117.pdf; https://academic.oup.com/annonc/article/24/7/1931/190440; http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/lookup/doi/10.1093/annonc/mdt117; http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/23559153
Faculty of 1000, Ltd.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know