N0539 phase II trial of fulvestrant and bevacizumab in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an aromatase inhibitor: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group (now Alliance) trial †
Annals of Oncology, ISSN: 0923-7534, Vol: 24, Issue: 10, Page: 2548-2554
2013
- 9Citations
- 49Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations9
- Citation Indexes9
- CrossRef8
- Captures49
- Readers49
- 49
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Fulvestrant and Bevacizumab in Treating Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer
STUDY INFORMATION OFFICIAL TITLE: Phase II Trial of Fulvestrant and Bevacizumab in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With an Aromatase Inhibitor CURRENT STATUS:
Article Description
Based on preclinical studies, the vascular endothelial pathway is an important mechanism for estrogen receptor resistance. We conducted a phase II study of fulvestrant and bevacizumab in patients with aromatase inhibitor pretreated metastatic breast cancer. A single-stage phase II study was conducted with these objectives: 6-month progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response, toxic effect, and overall survival. Regimen: 250 mg fulvestrant days 1 and 15 (cycle 1) then day 1 (cycle 2 and beyond) and 10 mg/kg bevacizumab days 1 and 15 of each 4-week cycle. At interim analysis, 20 eligible patients initiated treatment, 11 were progression free and on treatment at 3 months, not meeting the protocol-specified efficacy requirements (at least 12 of 20). Accrual remained open during interim analysis with 36 patients enrolling before final study closure. Among the 33 eligible patients, the median PFS was 6.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.6–10.1 months]. Of the 18 with measurable disease, 4 (22%) patients (95% CI 6% to 48%) had a confirmed tumor response (1 complete, 3 partial). The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were hypertension 3 (9%) and headache 3 (9%). The fulvestrant/bevacizumab combination is safe and tolerable; however, it did not meet its statistical end point.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0923753419370747; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt213; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84884721714&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23798616; http://f1000.com/prime/reports/reviews/793480259; http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.718023021.793480259; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0923753419370747; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt213; https://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.718023021.793480259; https://facultyopinions.com/prime/reports/reviews/793480259; http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/doi/10.1093/annonc/mdt213; https://www.journals.elsevier.com/annals-of-oncology; https://f1000.com/prime/reports/reviews/793480259; https://academic.oup.com/annonc/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/annonc/mdt213; http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/lookup/doi/10.1093/annonc/mdt213
Faculty of 1000, Ltd.
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know