Adaptations to foliar absorption of faeces: A pathway in plant carnivory
Annals of Botany, ISSN: 0305-7364, Vol: 95, Issue: 5, Page: 757-761
2005
- 41Citations
- 78Captures
- 3Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations41
- Citation Indexes41
- 41
- CrossRef33
- Captures78
- Readers78
- 78
- Mentions3
- References3
- 3
Article Description
• Background and Aims: Roridula plants capture insects but have no digestive enzymes. It has been hypothesized that Roridula leaves absorb nitrogen from the faeces of obligately associated, carnivorous hemipterans. But rapid movement across the leaf surfaces of most plant leaves is prevented by the presence of an impermeable cuticle. However, in carnivorous plants, cuticular gaps or pores in digestive/absorptive cells allow rapid movement across the leaf surface. Recently, it was suggested that the hemipteran-plant interaction constituted a new pathway for plant carnivory. Here, a further adaptation to this pathway is described by demonstrating how Roridula plants probably absorb hemipteran faeces rapidly through their leaf cuticles. • Methods: The dye neutral red was used to document the rapidity of foliar absorption and TEM to determine the nature of cuticular discontinuities in the leaf of Roridula. • Key Results: Aqueous compounds diffuse rapidly across the cuticle of Roridula's leaves but not across the cuticles of co-occurring, non-carnivorous plant leaves. Furthermore, immature Roridula leaves were unable to absorb neutral red whereas mature leaves could. Using TEM, cuticular gaps and pores similar to those in other carnivorous plants were found in the epidermal cells of mature Roridula leaves. • Conclusions: The leaf cuticle of Roridula is very thin (0-120 nm) and cell wall elements project close to the leaf surface, possibly enhancing foliar absorption. In addition to these, cuticular gaps were frequently seen and probably perfom a function similar to those found in other carnivorous plants: namely the absorption of aqueous compounds. The cuticular gaps of Roridula are probably an adaptation to plant carnivory, supporting the newly described pathway. © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. All rights reserved.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=23244467513&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci082; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15728666; https://academic.oup.com/aob/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/aob/mci082; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci082; https://academic.oup.com/aob/article/95/5/757/201245
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know