IBRAP: integrated benchmarking single-cell RNA-sequencing analytical pipeline
Briefings in Bioinformatics, ISSN: 1477-4054, Vol: 24, Issue: 2
2023
- 5Citations
- 22Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- Captures22
- Readers22
- 22
- Mentions1
- Blog Mentions1
- Blog1
Article Description
Single-cell ribonucleic acid (RNA)-sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a powerful tool to study cellular heterogeneity. The high dimensional data generated from this technology are complex and require specialized expertise for analysis and interpretation. The core of scRNAseq data analysis contains several key analytical steps, which include pre-processing, quality control, normalization, dimensionality reduction, integration and clustering. Each step often has many algorithms developed with varied underlying assumptions and implications. With such a diverse choice of tools available, benchmarking analyses have compared their performances and demonstrated that tools operate differentially according to the data types and complexity. Here, we present Integrated Benchmarking scRNA-seq Analytical Pipeline (IBRAP), which contains a suite of analytical components that can be interchanged throughout the pipeline alongside multiple benchmarking metrics that enable users to compare results and determine the optimal pipeline combinations for their data. We apply IBRAP to single- and multi-sample integration analysis using primary pancreatic tissue, cancer cell line and simulated data accompanied with ground truth cell labels, demonstrating the interchangeable and benchmarking functionality of IBRAP. Our results confirm that the optimal pipelines are dependent on individual samples and studies, further supporting the rationale and necessity of our tool. We then compare reference-based cell annotation with unsupervised analysis, both included in IBRAP, and demonstrate the superiority of the reference-based method in identifying robust major and minor cell types. Thus, IBRAP presents a valuable tool to integrate multiple samples and studies to create reference maps of normal and diseased tissues, facilitating novel biological discovery using the vast volume of scRNA-seq data available.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85150665725&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbad061; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36847692; https://academic.oup.com/bib/article/doi/10.1093/bib/bbad061/7058851; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbad061; https://academic.oup.com/bib/article/24/2/bbad061/7058851
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know