PPIntegrator: semantic integrative system for protein-protein interaction and application for host-pathogen datasets
Bioinformatics Advances, ISSN: 2635-0041, Vol: 3, Issue: 1, Page: vbad067
2023
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures9
- Readers9
Article Description
Summary: Semantic web standards have shown importance in the last 20 years in promoting data formalization and interlinking between the existing knowledge graphs. In this context, several ontologies and data integration initiatives have emerged in recent years for the biological area, such as the broadly used Gene Ontology that contains metadata to annotate gene function and subcellular location. Another important subject in the biological area is protein-protein interactions (PPIs) which have applications like protein function inference. Current PPI databases have heterogeneous exportation methods that challenge their integration and analysis. Presently, several initiatives of ontologies covering some concepts of the PPI domain are available to promote interoperability across datasets. However, the efforts to stimulate guidelines for automatic semantic data integration and analysis for PPIs in these datasets are limited. Here, we present PPIntegrator, a system that semantically describes data related to protein interactions. We also introduce an enrichment pipeline to generate, predict and validate new potential host-pathogen datasets by transitivity analysis. PPIntegrator contains a data preparation module to organize data from three reference databases and a triplification and data fusion module to describe the provenance information and results. This work provides an overview of the PPIntegrator system applied to integrate and compare host-pathogen PPI datasets from four bacterial species using our proposed transitivity analysis pipeline. We also demonstrated some critical queries to analyze this kind of data and highlight the importance and usage of the semantic data generated by our system.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85164359093&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioadv/vbad067; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37359724; https://academic.oup.com/bioinformaticsadvances/article/doi/10.1093/bioadv/vbad067/7188121; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioadv/vbad067; https://academic.oup.com/bioinformaticsadvances/article/3/1/vbad067/7188121
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know