Noise-Transfer2Clean: Denoising cryo-EM images based on noise modeling and transfer
Bioinformatics, ISSN: 1460-2059, Vol: 38, Issue: 7, Page: 2022-2029
2022
- 17Citations
- 45Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes17
- 17
- CrossRef4
- Captures45
- Readers45
- 45
Article Description
Motivation: Cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) is a widely used technology for ultrastructure determination, which constructs the 3D structures of protein and macromolecular complex from a set of 2D micrographs. However, limited by the electron beam dose, the micrographs in cryo-EM generally suffer from the extremely low signal-To-noise ratio (SNR), which hampers the efficiency and effectiveness of downstream analysis. Especially, the noise in cryo-EM is not simple additive or multiplicative noise whose statistical characteristics are quite different from the ones in natural image, extremely shackling the performance of conventional denoising methods. Results: Here, we introduce the Noise-Transfer2Clean (NT2C), a denoising deep neural network (DNN) for cryo-EM to enhance image contrast and restore specimen signal, whose main idea is to improve the denoising performance by correctly learning the noise distribution of cryo-EM images and transferring the statistical nature of noise into the denoiser. Especially, to cope with the complex noise model in cryo-EM, we design a contrast-guided noise and signal re-weighted algorithm to achieve clean-noisy data synthesis and data augmentation, making our method authentically achieve signal restoration based on noise's true properties. Our work verifies the feasibility of denoising based on mining the complex cryo-EM noise patterns directly from the noise patches. Comprehensive experimental results on simulated datasets and real datasets show that NT2C achieved a notable improvement in image denoising, especially in background noise removal, compared with the commonly used methods. Moreover, a case study on the real dataset demonstrates that NT2C can greatly alleviate the obstacles caused by the SNR to particle picking and simplify the identifying of particles. Availabilityand implementation: The code is available at https://github.com/Lihongjia-ict/NoiseTransfer2Clean/.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85128343192&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac052; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35134862; https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/38/7/2022/6522116; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac052
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know