ZipHiC: a novel Bayesian framework to identify enriched interactions and experimental biases in Hi-C data
Bioinformatics, ISSN: 1460-2059, Vol: 38, Issue: 14, Page: 3523-3531
2022
- 4Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes4
- CrossRef2
- Captures19
- Readers19
- 14
Article Description
Motivation: Several computational and statistical methods have been developed to analyze data generated through the 3C-based methods, especially the Hi-C.Most of the existing methods do not account for dependency in Hi-C data. Results: Here, we present ZipHiC, a novel statistical method to explore Hi-C data focusing on the detection of enriched contacts. ZipHiC implements a Bayesian method based on a hidden Markov random field (HMRF) model and the Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) to detect interactions in two-dimensional space based on a Hi-C contact frequency matrix. ZipHiC uses data on the sources of biases related to the contact frequency matrix, allows borrowing information from neighbours using the Potts model and improves computation speed using the ABC model. In addition to outperforming existing tools on both simulated and real data, our model also provides insights into different sources of biases that affects Hi-C data. We show that some datasets display higher biases from DNA accessibility or Transposable Elements content. Furthermore, our analysis in Drosophila melanogaster showed that approximately half of the detected significant interactions connect promoters with other parts of the genome indicating a functional biological role. Finally, we found that the micro-C datasets display higher biases from DNA accessibility compared to a similar Hi-C experiment, but this can be corrected by ZipHiC.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85134921650&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac387; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35678507; https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/38/14/3523/6604725; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btac387
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know