Selecting a classification function for class prediction with gene expression data
Bioinformatics, ISSN: 1460-2059, Vol: 32, Issue: 12, Page: 1814-1822
2016
- 10Citations
- 31Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef9
- Captures31
- Readers31
- 31
Article Description
Motivation: Class predicting with gene expression is widely used to generate diagnostic and/or prognostic models. The literature reveals that classification functions perform differently across gene expression datasets. The question, which classification function should be used for a given dataset remains to be answered. In this study, a predictive model for choosing an optimal function for class prediction on a given dataset was devised. Results: To achieve this, gene expression data were simulated for different values of gene-pairs correlations, sample size, genes' variances, deferentially expressed genes and fold changes. For each simulated dataset, ten classifiers were built and evaluated using ten classification functions. The resulting accuracies from 1152 different simulation scenarios by ten classification functions were then modeled using a linear mixed effects regression on the studied data characteristics, yielding a model that predicts the accuracy of the functions on a given data. An application of our model on eight real-life datasets showed positive correlations (0.33-0.82) between the predicted and expected accuracies. Conclusion: The here presented predictive model might serve as a guide to choose an optimal classification function among the 10 studied functions, for any given gene expression data. Availability and implementation: The R source code for the analysis and an R-package 'SPreFuGED' are available at Bioinformatics online. Contact: Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84976507439&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw034; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26873933; https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/32/12/1814/1743178; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw034
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know