Linearity of network proximity measures: Implications for set-based queries and significance testing
Bioinformatics, ISSN: 1460-2059, Vol: 33, Issue: 9, Page: 1354-1361
2017
- 7Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- CrossRef2
- Captures19
- Readers19
- 19
Article Description
Motivation: In recent years, various network proximity measures have been proposed to facilitate the use of biomolecular interaction data in a broad range of applications. These applications include functional annotation, disease gene prioritization, comparative analysis of biological systems and prediction of new interactions. In such applications, a major task is the scoring or ranking of the nodes in the network in terms of their proximity to a given set of 'seed' nodes (e.g. a group of proteins that are identified to be associated with a disease, or are deferentially expressed in a certain condition). Many different network proximity measures are utilized for this purpose, and these measures are quite diverse in terms of the benefits they offer. Results: We propose a unifying framework for characterizing network proximity measures for setbased queries. We observe that many existing measures are linear, in that the proximity of a node to a set of nodes can be represented as an aggregation of its proximity to the individual nodes in the set. Based on this observation, we propose methods for processing of set-based proximity queries that take advantage of sparse local proximity information. In addition, we provide an analytical framework for characterizing the distribution of proximity scores based on reference models that accurately capture the characteristics of the seed set (e.g. degree distribution and biological function). The resulting framework facilitates computation of exact figures for the statistical significance of network proximity scores, enabling assessment of the accuracy of Monte Carlo simulation based estimation methods.
Bibliographic Details
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know