Statistical hybrid detection and the inference of ancestral distribution areas in Tolpis (Asteraceae)
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, ISSN: 1095-8312, Vol: 121, Issue: 1, Page: 133-149
2017
- 8Citations
- 28Usage
- 19Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- Usage28
- Downloads27
- Abstract Views1
- Captures19
- Readers19
- 19
Article Description
Many historical biogeographic studies do not account for the effect of hybrid taxa on phylogenetic tree inference, despite recent advances in the statistical identification of such taxa. This investigation aims to illustrate the impact that hybrid taxa can have on ancestral area reconstructions of the plant genus Tolpis, which displays an evolutionary history possibly indicative of a back-colonization of the continental Mediterranean. We evaluate and apply two statistical hybrid detection methods, JML and STEM-hy, which assist in identifying reticulate patterns of allele coalescence. We also evaluate and apply a software tool, P2C2M, to test the fit of genetic loci to the multispecies coalescent model (MSCM). The application of these tools to a previously published data set of three nuclear DNA markers indicates the presence of several potential hybrid taxa in Tolpis. One nuclear marker is found to display a reduced level of reticulate history, a good fit to the MSCM and minimal signal of gene flow across archipelagoes. Ancestral distribution areas are reconstructed on gene and species trees of Tolpis before and after the exclusion of putative hybrid taxa using stochastic character mapping, parameterized likelihood reconstructions, and reconstructions under continuous-time Markov chain models. The results of these reconstructions indicate that taxa of hybrid origin may have a considerable impact on ancestral area reconstruction and that it is important to account for such taxa prior to biogeographic analysis. We conclude that Tolpis has likely had a time-consistent distribution in island habitats and originated on the Canary Islands.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85019064209&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blw014; https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/biolinnean/blw014; https://scholars.fhsu.edu/biology_facpubs/39; https://scholars.fhsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1038&context=biology_facpubs; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blw014; https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article-abstract/121/1/133/2915831?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know