Combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia and maternal intrapartum temperature during vaginal delivery: a randomized clinical trial
British Journal of Anaesthesia, ISSN: 0007-0912, Vol: 107, Issue: 5, Page: 762-768
2011
- 36Citations
- 82Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations36
- Citation Indexes34
- 34
- CrossRef27
- Policy Citations2
- 2
- Captures82
- Readers82
- 82
Article Description
We determined the association between combined spinal–epidural (CSE) anaesthesia and an increase in maternal intrapartum temperature and intrapartum fever. A randomized, open clinical trial was performed with 70 pregnant women, 35 receiving CSE and 35 receiving only non-pharmacological methods of pain relief during delivery. Association between CSE and changes in the patient's temperature, the risk of maternal fever, and other maternal and perinatal outcomes was determined at a 5% significance level. Number needed to harm (NNH) was calculated for maternal fever. Patients receiving CSE anaesthesia during vaginal delivery experienced a significant increase in intrapartum temperature and five (14%) developed fever, whereas no cases occurred in the group receiving only non-pharmacological methods of pain relief ( P =0.027). None of the women who developed fever received antibiotics or were submitted to further investigation; however, all progressed without complication. No case of chorioamnionitis or any maternal or neonatal infection was detected. NNH for maternal fever was 7.0 (95% confidence interval: 3.8–51.9). The use of CSE is associated with a significant increase in maternal temperature and in the incidence of intrapartum maternal fever. However, the increase in maternal temperature does not appear to provoke any deleterious effects on the mother or child.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091217326120; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer218; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=80054095102&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21743067; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0007091217326120; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer218
Elsevier BV
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know