Lesion network mapping of eye-opening apraxia
Brain Communications, ISSN: 2632-1297, Vol: 5, Issue: 6, Page: fcad288
2023
- 5Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures5
- Readers5
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- 1
Most Recent News
Data on Apraxias Published by a Researcher at Copenhagen University Hospital (Lesion network mapping of eye-opening apraxia)
2023 NOV 10 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Pain & Central Nervous System Daily News -- A new study on apraxias
Article Description
Apraxia of eyelid opening (or eye-opening apraxia) is characterized by the inability to voluntarily open the eyes because of impaired supranuclear control. Here, we examined the neural substrates implicated in eye-opening apraxia through lesion network mapping. We analysed brain lesions from 27 eye-opening apraxia stroke patients and compared them with lesions from 20 aphasia and 45 hemiballismus patients serving as controls. Lesions were mapped onto a standard brain atlas using resting-state functional MRI data derived from 966 healthy adults in the Harvard Dataverse. Our analyses revealed that most eye-opening apraxia-associated lesions occurred in the right hemisphere, with subcortical or mixed cortical/subcortical involvement. Despite their anatomical heterogeneity, these lesions functionally converged on the bilateral dorsal anterior and posterior insula. The functional connectivity map for eye-opening apraxia was distinct from those for aphasia and hemiballismus. Hemiballismus lesions predominantly mapped onto the putamen, particularly the posterolateral region, while aphasia lesions were localized to language-processing regions, primarily within the frontal operculum. In summary, in patients with eye-opening apraxia, disruptions in the dorsal anterior and posterior insula may compromise their capacity to initiate the appropriate eyelid-opening response to relevant interoceptive and exteroceptive stimuli, implicating a complex interplay between salience detection and motor execution.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85178033953&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcad288; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37953849; https://academic.oup.com/braincomms/article/doi/10.1093/braincomms/fcad288/7331271; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcad288; https://academic.oup.com/braincomms/article/5/6/fcad288/7331271
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know