Acute Myocardial Infarction and Community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection: An Observational Cohort Study
Clinical Infectious Diseases, ISSN: 1537-6591, Vol: 73, Issue: 9, Page: E2647-E2655
2021
- 7Citations
- 17Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes6
- CrossRef3
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures17
- Readers17
- 17
Article Description
Background: The relationship between acute myocardial infarction and infection was recognized in the early 20th century during influenza epidemics. Most recently, a case control study and a self-control design study have identified an association between Staphylococcus aureus infection and acute myocardial infarction. We assessed the association of community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (CA-SABSI) and myocardial infarction in the 365 days following blood culture. Methods: This was a cohort study assessing the incidence of myocardial infarction 365 days after blood culture for Staphylococcus aureus. Culture-negative patients had blood cultures collected at hospital attendance and were matched to the CA-SABSI participants by sex, 5-year age strata, and year of culture collection. Pathology information was linked to hospital administrative data and index of relative socioeconomic advantage and disadvantage (ISRAD). Results: The study included 5157 CA-SABSI cases matched to 10 146 blood culture-negative cases. The mortality rate was significantly higher in the CA-SABSI group (10.9%; 562/5157) than in culture-negative cases (5.1%; 521/10 146) at 365 days (P<.0001). In the 7 days following the index blood culture, excluding recurrent events, there were 89 (1.7%) and 37 (.4%) myocardial infarction diagnoses in the CA-SABSI and culture-negative cases, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression for myocardial infarction demonstrated a significant association with CA-SABSI after adjusting for known risk factors (odds ratio [OR], 5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3-7.5; P<.0001). Myocardial infarctions occurring in this short-term risk period were associated with all-cause mortality in a Cox proportional hazard model (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.4; P<.005). Conclusions: CA-SABSI is associated with an increased short-term risk of myocardial infarction, which is associated with subsequent mortality.
Bibliographic Details
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know