In Vitro Activities of Ceftaroline/Avibactam, Ceftazidime/Avibactam, and Other Comparators Against Pathogens from Various Complicated Infections in China
Clinical Infectious Diseases, ISSN: 1537-6591, Vol: 67, Issue: suppl_2, Page: S206-S216
2018
- 17Citations
- 29Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes17
- 17
- CrossRef4
- Captures29
- Readers29
- 29
Article Description
Background. We conducted a national antimicrobial surveillance study of both gram-positive and gram-negative organisms isolated from hospitalized patients. This report presents data on antimicrobial susceptibility among 4998 organisms collected in China between 2012 and 2014. Method. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and susceptibilities of ceftaroline/avibactam (CPA), ceftazidime/ avibactam (CZA) and a range of comparative agents were determined according to guidelines established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Results. The highest overall susceptibility levels for all Enterobacteriaceae during the study period were observed for CPA, CZA, doripenem (DOR), meropenem (MEM), and amikacin (AMK), which were all >90%. However, both CPT and CAZ alone and in combination with avibactam showed low activities for Acinetobacter spp., whereas CPA and CZA exhibited MIC90 values for Pseudomonas aeruginosa that were reduced by 4- and 8-fold, respectively, compared with those of CPT and CAZ. High susceptibilities of Acinetobacter spp. and P. aeruginosa to colistin and P. aeruginosa to AMK were observed. For the gram-positive strains, no significant activity changes were seen for Enterococcus, Staphylococcus, and viridans group streptococci to CPT or CAZ alone or in combination with avibactam, whereas Streptococcus pneumoniae and β-hemolytic Streptococcus showed almost 100% susceptibility to both CPT and CPA. Conclusion. The addition of 4 mg/L avibactam greatly increased the activities of CPT and CAZ against most Enterobacteriaceae and P. aeruginosa isolates, whereas no significant changes were observed in Acinetobacter spp. or any of the gram-positive strains.
Bibliographic Details
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know