ELISA for urinary trehalase with monoclonal antibodies: A technique for assessment of tubular damage
Clinical Chemistry, ISSN: 0009-9147, Vol: 46, Issue: 5, Page: 636-643
2000
- 4Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Background: α,α-Trehalase, located on renal proximal tubules, is a glycoprotein that hydrolyses α,α-trehalose to two glucose molecules. Urinary trehalase reflects damage to renal proximal tubules, but its activity has not been measured routinely because measurement of catalytic activity is rather complicated and because conventional assays for enzyme activity might not reflect all of the trehalase protein because of enzyme inactivation in urinary samples. Methods: We established novel monoclonal antibodies for human trehalase and a sandwich ELISA for quantification of urinary trehalase. We determined the urinary trehalase protein concentration with this ELISA and trehalase catalytic activity, and the results of these two methods were compared. Results: The ELISA system was more sensitive than the detection of enzyme activity and could detect a subtle difference in the amount of trehalase present in renal diseases. The within- and between-assay CVs in the ELISA were 6.7-7.6% and 6.2-8.2%, respectively. Highly significant increases in both the quantity and activity were seen in patients with nephrotic syndrome (acute phase), Lowe syndrome, and Dent disease. The quantities were 70- to 200-fold greater, whereas enzyme activities were, at most, 10-fold higher than those of control subjects. In the detection of small amounts of trehalase in patients with chronic glomerulonephritis and renal anomalies, quantities were better than enzyme activities. Conclusions: We have established an ELISA system for quantification of urinary trehalase that uses novel monoclonal antibodies. Our ELISA system is simpler and more sensitive than a conventional activity assay and reflects trehalase protein. This ELISA can be a useful as a common tool for clinical assessment of renal proximal tubular damage. (C) 2000 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know