Polymorphisms of TLR4: Rapid genotyping and reduced response to lipopolysaccharide of TLR4 mutant alleles
Clinical Chemistry, ISSN: 0009-9147, Vol: 48, Issue: 10, Page: 1661-1667
2002
- 104Citations
- 59Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Background: Pathogen recognition receptors such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns, lead to the activation of innate immunity. Genetic variations in these receptors may lead to an altered host immune response to pathogens. Methods: We developed homogeneous fluorescence-based PCR assays as well as matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) genotyping assays to detect TLR4 polymorphisms. These assays were compared with restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. Peripheral blood monocytes from donors with differing genotypes were prepared and exposed to bacterial products in vitro. The abundance of mRNAs of the proinflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α from these monocytes were monitored by real-time reverse transcription-PCR. Results: By our homogeneous PCR method, the allele frequencies were 5.6% for the TLR4 Asp299Gly and 6.0% for the TLR4 Thr399Ile polymorphism in 116 healthy German Caucasians. Nine incorrect genotype calls were detected in the RFLP analysis and two in the TaqMan genotype analysis. MALDI-TOF-MS allowed clear detection of all TLR4 alleles. Monocytes from donors homozygous for the TLR4 mutant alleles Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile were lipopolysaccharide hyporesponsive and exhibited median effective concentrations (ECs) approximately fourfold higher than those of monocytes carrying wild-type or heterozygous alleles. In contrast, a TLR2 agonist elicited similar responses in monocytes irrespective of the TLR4 genotype. Conclusions: Homogeneous fluorescence-based PCR assays provide a specific and sensitive method for high-throughput genotyping of TLR4 mutations. The newly developed PCR and MALDI-TOF-MS assays may be useful to evaluate the presence of TLR4 polymorphisms in patients to predict susceptibility to bacterial infection. © 2002 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0036790341&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/48.10.1661; https://academic.oup.com/clinchem/article/48/10/1661/5642311; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/48.10.1661; https://academic.oup.com/clinchem/article-abstract/48/10/1661/5642311?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know