The confidence information ontology: A step towards a standard for asserting confidence in annotations
Database, ISSN: 1758-0463, Vol: 2015, Issue: 0, Page: bav043
2015
- 29Citations
- 246Usage
- 66Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations29
- Citation Indexes29
- 29
- CrossRef9
- Usage246
- Downloads217
- Abstract Views29
- Captures66
- Readers66
- 66
- Mentions1
- References1
- Wikipedia1
Article Description
Biocuration has become a cornerstone for analyses in biology, and to meet needs, the amount of annotations has considerably grown in recent years. However, the reliability of these annotations varies; it has thus become necessary to be able to assess the confidence in annotations. Although several resources already provide confidence information about the annotations that they produce, a standard way of providing such information has yet to be defined. This lack of standardization undermines the propagation of knowledge across resources, as well as the credibility of results from high-throughput analyses. Seeded at a workshop during the Biocuration 2012 conference, a working group has been created to address this problem. We present here the elements that were identified as essential for assessing confidence in annotations, as well as a draft ontology-the Confidence Information Ontology-to illustrate how the problems identified could be addressed. We hope that this effort will provide a home for discussing this major issue among the biocuration community.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84943194552&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/database/bav043; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25957950; https://academic.oup.com/database/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/database/bav043; https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/si_facpub/139; https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1138&context=si_facpub; https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/si_facpub/139; https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1138&context=si_facpub; http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11850/104527; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/database/bav043; https://academic.oup.com/database/article/doi/10.1093/database/bav043/2433175; http://dx.doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000104527; https://dx.doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000104527; https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/104527; https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/bitstream/20.500.11850/104527/2/bav043.pdf; http://database.oxfordjournals.org/lookup/doi/10.1093/database/bav043; https://academic.oup.com/database/article-pdf/doi/10.1093/database/bav043/16976047/bav043.pdf; http://database.oxfordjournals.org/content/2015/bav043; http://database.oxfordjournals.org/content/2015/bav043.abstract; http://database.oxfordjournals.org/content/2015/bav043.full; http://database.oxfordjournals.org/content/2015/bav043.full.pdf; https://academic.oup.com/database/article/2433175/The-Confidence-Information-Ontology-a-step-towards; http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/25957950; http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4425939; http://database.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/doi/10.1093/database/bav043
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know