The fate of the downstream aorta after total arch replacement
European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery, ISSN: 1873-734X, Vol: 62, Issue: 5
2022
- 8Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef1
- Captures4
- Readers4
Article Description
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to evaluate the fate of the downstream aorta following total arch replacement. METHODS: Between October 1999 and March 2018, a total of 740 patients underwent total arch replacement. After excluding connective tissue disease, previous descending or thoracoabdominal aortic surgery, patients without adequate preoperative images or operative mortality, late outcomes consisting of additional surgery for distal dilation and distal aortic events were evaluated in 623 survivors (240 aortic dissections, including 139 patients with acute dissection and 383 with a non-dissection aneurysm). The mean follow-up was 5.0 ± 4.0 years. RESULTS: The mean preoperative maximum diameter of the descending aorta was 36.9 ± 8.0 mm. An elephant trunk was inserted in 232 patients, including 183 patients with aortic dissection. Freedom from additional surgery for distal dilation was 88.5% at 5 years and 80.2% at 10 years. Freedom from distal aortic events was 81.9% at 5 years and 70.5% at 10 years. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated that the preoperative diameter of the descending aorta was a significant risk factor for unfavourable distal aortic events. Computed tomography evaluation demonstrated a significant increase in the descending aortic diameter over time (P < 0.001). Positive aortic remodelling was observed in the proximal descending (P < 0.001) to mid-descending (P < 0.001) aorta exclusively in patients with acute aortic dissection. CONCLUSIONS: The diameter of the descending aorta increased significantly after total arch replacement, particularly in the distal descending aorta. The preoperative descending aortic diameter portended a significant risk for unfavourable distal aortic events.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85140417966&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezac443; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36063035; https://academic.oup.com/ejcts/article/doi/10.1093/ejcts/ezac443/6692309; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezac443; https://academic.oup.com/ejcts/article/62/5/ezac443/6692309
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know