Age Trends in Growth and Differentiation Factor-11 and Myostatin Levels in Healthy Men, and Differential Response to Testosterone, Measured Using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, ISSN: 1758-535X, Vol: 77, Issue: 4, Page: 763-769
2022
- 15Citations
- 28Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations15
- Citation Indexes15
- 15
- CrossRef3
- Captures28
- Readers28
- 28
Article Description
Background: Growth and differentiation factor (GDF)-11 controls embryonic development and has been proposed as an antiaging factor. GDF-8 (myostatin) inhibits skeletal muscle growth. Difficulties in accurately measuring circulating GDF-11 and GDF-8 have generated controversy. Methods: We developed a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method for simultaneous measurement of circulating GDF-8 and GDF-11 that employs denaturation, reduction, and alkylation; cation-exchange solid-phase extraction; tryptic digestion; followed by separation and quantification using 2 signature peptides for multiple reaction monitoring and C-terminal [13C615N4]-Arg peptides as internal standards. We evaluated age trends in serum GDF-11 and GDF-8 concentrations in community-dwelling healthy men, 19 years or older, and determined the effects of graded testosterone doses on GDF-8 and GDF-11 concentrations in healthy men in a randomized trial. Results: The assay demonstrated linearity over a wide range, lower limit of quantitation 0.5 ng/mL for both proteins, and excellent precision, accuracy, and specificity (no detectable cross-reactivity of GDF-8 in GDF-11 assay or of GDF-11 in GDF-8 assay). Mean ± SD (median ± 1QR) GDF-8 and GDF-11 levels in healthy community-dwelling men, 19 years and older, were 7.2±1.9 (6.8±1.4) ng/mL. Neither GDF-8 nor GDF-11 levels were related to age or body composition. Testosterone treatment significantly increased serum GDF-8 but not GDF-11 levels. Conclusions: The LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous measurement of circulating total GDF-8 and GDF-11 demonstrates the characteristics of a valid assay. Testosterone treatment increased GDF-8 levels, but not GDF-11. Increase in GDF-8 levels by testosterone treatment, which increased muscle mass, suggests that GDF-8 acts as a chalone to restrain muscle growth.
Bibliographic Details
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know