Metrics of Physiological Network Topology Are Novel Biomarkers to Capture Functional Disability and Health
Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, ISSN: 1758-535X, Vol: 80, Issue: 1
2025
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Article Description
Background: Physiological networks are highly complex, integrating connections among multiple organ systems and their dynamic changes underlying human aging. It is unknown whether individual-level network could serve as robust biomarkers for health and aging. Methods: We used personalized network analysis to construct a single-sample network and examine the associations between network properties and functional disability in the Rugao Longevity and Aging Study (RuLAS), the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS), and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Results: We observed impairments in interconnected physiological systems among long-lived adults in RuLAS. Single-sample network analysis was applied to reflect the co-occurrence of these multisystem impairments at the individual level. The activities of daily living (ADL)-disabled individuals' networks exhibited notably increased connectivity among various biomarkers. Significant associations were found between network topology and functional disability across RuLAS, CHARLS, CLHLS, and NHANES. Additionally, network topology served as a novel biomarker to capture risks of incident ADL disability in CHARLS. Furthermore, these metrics of physiological network topology predicted mortality across 4 cohorts. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the prediction performance of network topology remained robust, regardless of the chosen biomarkers and parameters. Conclusions: These findings showed that metrics of network topology were sensitive and robust biomarkers to capture risks of functional disability and mortality, highlighting the role of single-sample physiological networks as novel biomarkers for health and aging.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85213596509&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glae268; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39500737; https://academic.oup.com/biomedgerontology/article/doi/10.1093/gerona/glae268/7876538; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glae268; https://academic.oup.com/biomedgerontology/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/gerona/glae268/7876538?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know