PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Characterization of the wheat germ agglutinin binding to self-assembled monolayers of neoglycoconjugates by AFM and SPR

Glycobiology, ISSN: 0959-6658, Vol: 19, Issue: 6, Page: 633-643
2009
  • 24
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 55
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Article Description

Carbohydrate-protein interactions govern many crucial life processes involved in cell recognition events, but are often difficult to study because the interactions are weak, and multivalent exposure appears to be crucial for their biological function. We have used self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) of neoglycoconjugates as a model system to probe the specific interactions between the lectin wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) and monosaccharides by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and atomic force microscopy (AFM) force measurements. SAMs presenting N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (GlcNAc) as a neoglycoconjugate were produced on gold surfaces, where the SAM formation was monitored using a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) and shown to be a very rapid process. In the AFM force measurements WGA was covalently coupled to flexible polyethylene glycol (PEG) molecules at a probe surface using amine coupling. GlcNAc-specific binding events were detected with a WGA-modified probe on the GlcNAc-neoglycoconjugate SAM at bond rupture forces of 47 ± 15 pN. Additionally, less frequent GlcNAc-specific unbinding events were detected at higher forces (120 ± 20 pN) which are believed to originate from simultaneous detachment of multiple binding sites from the SAM surface. SPR measurements confirmed that WGA has higher affinity toward the immobilized GlcNAc-SAM than toward the soluble free monosaccharide. The binding constants obtained for soluble chitinoligosaccharides suggested up to three subsites within one carbohydrate-binding site of the WGA molecule and also provided further evidence of the multivalent binding character of the WGA dimer. © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Bibliographic Details

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know