Differential effect of CD8 and CD8 dendritic cells in the stimulation of secondary CD4 T cells
International Immunology, ISSN: 0953-8178, Vol: 13, Issue: 4, Page: 465-473
2001
- 44Citations
- 42Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations44
- Citation Indexes44
- 44
- CrossRef40
- Captures42
- Readers42
- 41
Article Description
Dendritic cells (DC), in their role in initiation of the adaptive immune response, have been extensively studied for their capacity to interact and stimulate naive T cells. Subsets of mature murine DC isolated directly from the spleen have been shown to differ in their ability to induce proliferative responses in both primary CD4 and primary Cd8 T cells; the myeloid-related CD8α DC induce a more intense or prolonged proliferation of naive T cells than do the lymphoid-related DC bearing CD8α despite similar expression of MHC and co-stimulatory molecules. Here we examine the interaction of these DC subpopulations with T cells already in the activated or memory state which are known to have greater sensitivity to antigen stimulation and bear receptors with increased capacity for signal transduction. We show that influenza virus-specific CD4 T cell clones and splenic T cells from peptide-primed animals proliferated in response to antigen presented by separated splenic CD8 DC. In contrast, these T cells showed only weak, if any, proliferation in response to CD8 DC despite observable cluster formation in the cultures. The differential between the two DC types in inducing proliferation was even more pronounced than previously seen with primary T cells and did not reflect differential longevity of the DC in culture, altered response kinetics or deviation from IL-2 to IL-4 induction with CD8 DC, but was related to the levels of IL-2 induced. The deficiency in the CD8 DC was not overcome by using infectious virus rather than synthetic peptide as the antigen source. These results show that lymphoid-related CD8 splenic DC, despite their mature phenotype, fail to provide appropriate signals to secondary CD4 T cells to sustain their proliferation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0035070641&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intimm/13.4.465; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11282986; https://academic.oup.com/intimm/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/intimm/13.4.465; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/intimm/13.4.465; https://academic.oup.com/intimm/article-abstract/13/4/465/650360?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know