Within-farm dynamics of ESBL/AmpC-producing escherichia coli in veal calves: A longitudinal approach
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, ISSN: 0305-7453, Vol: 68, Issue: 11, Page: 2468-2476
2013
- 54Citations
- 70Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations54
- Citation Indexes48
- 48
- CrossRef11
- Policy Citations6
- Policy Citation6
- Captures70
- Readers70
- 70
Article Description
Objectives: To assess the within-farm dynamics of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)/AmpC-producing Escherichia coli in veal calves. Methods: Three veal-calf fattening farms were screened. Faecal samples from all calves within a compartment (109-150 per farm)were taken upon arrival on the farm (T0) and after 3, 6, 8 and 10 weeks (T3-T10). ESBL/AmpC genes were characterized by PCR and sequencing. Plasmids were characterized by transformation, PCR-based replicon typing and plasmid multilocus sequence typing (MLST). E. coli genotypes were analysed by MLST. Results: At T0 the prevalence of ESBL/AmpC-producing E. coli ranged from18%to 26%. Thesewere predominantly isolates carrying bla and bla genes, located on various plasmids and E. coli sequence types (STs). Farm 1 was negative for ESBL/AmpC-producing E. coli after T0. Farm 2 showed an increase up to 37% at T3, which subsequently decreased gradually to 0% at T10. The presence from T3 to T10 on farm 2 was mainly caused by the clonal spread of a multiresistant E. coli ST57 harbouring bla on an IncF F2:A-:B- plasmid. Farm 3 showed a gradual decrease in prevalence to 1.4% at T10, with a relative increase of the identical clonal variant as shown for farm 2. A second clonal variant found in farm 3 was a multiresistant E. coli ST10 harbouring bla on an IncK plasmid. Conclusions: The prevalence of ESBL/AmpC-producing E. coli decreased over time.Aclonal spreadwas observedon farm 2 and farm 3, illustrative of the complex dynamics probably associated with the use of antimicrobials. © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84886290739&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt219; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23759504; https://academic.oup.com/jac/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/jac/dkt219; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt219; https://academic.oup.com/jac/article-abstract/68/11/2468/829929?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know