Chicken meal is not an appropriate reference protein for estimating protein quality of ingredients used in extruded diets intended for dogs
Journal of Animal Science, ISSN: 1525-3163, Vol: 102
2024
- 20Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures20
- Readers20
- 20
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Article Description
The indicator amino acid oxidation (IAAO) method has been used to determine metabolic availability (MA) of amino acids in feedstuffs for pigs, humans, and preliminarily for cats. Peas are a commonly used protein source in grain-free extruded dog diets. However, peas have a poor sulfur amino acid (AA) ratio (methionine [Met]:cysteine) with Met being the first limiting AA. Furthermore, little is known about the MA of Met in peas fed to dogs. Therefore, our objective was to compare the MA of Met in peas to chicken meal (CM), as a gold-standard reference protein. The study was done as a replicated 5 × 5 complete Latin square design. Ten neutered male mixed-breed dogs (1.5 years old; 26.0 kg ± 2.4 kg body weight; BW) fed to maintain ideal BW received all dietary treatments: BAS: lamb-based diet (deboned lamb and lamb meal) providing Met at 50% of its requirement (0.27 g/100g dry matter [DM]), CHK: CM and lamb-based diet, and PEA: ground dried pea and lamb-based diet both providing Met at 68% of its requirement (0.35 and 0.37 g/100g DM, respectively). Two other treatments were created by blending BAS with PEA (BAP) and the BAS with CHK (BAC) to create diets with Met at 59% of requirement (0.32 and 0.31 g/100g DM, respectively). This resulted in three graded levels of Met for both CM and peas to allow for a slope-ratio assay approach to quantify MA with the BAS diet as the common first point. All other AAs were provided to meet at least 120% of the AAFCO recommendations for adult dogs. The BAS diet, with supplemental DL-Met, was fed for a 2-wk wash-in period. After 2 d of diet adaptation IAAO was performed. Dogs were fed 13 small meals where meal 6 contained a priming dose (9.4 mg/kg BW) of L-[1-C]-phenylalanine (Phe; 99%) as well as a constant dose (2.4 mg/kg BW) in meals 6-13. Breath samples were collected and enrichment of CO was measured using isotope-ratio mass spectrometry to calculate the rate of Phe oxidation (FCO umol/kg BW/h). Oxidation was analyzed via SAS using PROC GLIMMIX with dog and period as random effects, and diet, %Met, and their interaction as fixed effects. Unexpectedly, the slope of Phe oxidation, in response to increasing Met intake, from CM was 31% of that of peas, indicating a lower MA for Met in CM as compared to peas. This finding may be due to damage of AAs during rendering. At this time, CM in extruded diets is not an acceptable reference protein to determine MA of AAs in dogs, and the MA of Met from peas cannot be confidently assessed.
Bibliographic Details
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know