Mortality of Emerald Ash Borer Larvae in Small Regenerating Ash in New York Forests
Journal of Economic Entomology, ISSN: 1938-291X, Vol: 115, Issue: 5, Page: 1442-1454
2022
- 12Citations
- 26Captures
- 4Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations12
- Citation Indexes12
- 12
- Captures26
- Readers26
- 26
- Mentions4
- News Mentions4
- News4
Most Recent News
Emerald ash borers are killing NH's ash trees. Meet the wasps that could save them.
Earlier this summer, during a scheduled tree removal, Portsmouth city arborist Max Wiater and his crew experienced something like never before. “The tree was so
Article Description
Despite a robust biocontrol program against emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae), parasitoid populations cannot build quickly enough to save mature ash trees. The future of ash as a viable component of North American forests depends on survival of immature ash that were too small to be attacked during the initial outbreak. This study was designed to quantify impacts of established introduced parasitoids and native woodpeckers on the population growth of emerald ash borer infesting regenerating ash saplings in white ash forests. Most emerald ash borer larvae were killed by Tetrastichus planipennisi Yang and woodpeckers in the fourth instar. Life-table analyses revealed that the estimated net reproductive rate of emerald ash borer was R0 = 4.2 in eastern New York and R0 = 0.0 in western New York. Without mortality from parasitoids and woodpeckers, R0 values would have been 16.4 and 7.9 in eastern and western New York, respectively. We monitored the health of mature and sapling ash trees from 2012 to 2017 and found that large trees were significantly more likely to be infested with emerald ash borer and to die than smaller trees. Fifty-four percent to 81% of ash saplings contained no living emerald ash borer, and the density of emerald ash borer at all sites was very low (< 4/m2). This study adds to the growing body of evidence that emerald ash borer biocontrol is contributing to population control and can help promote survival of young ash trees as forests recover from emerald ash borer outbreaks.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85139739499&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jee/toac078; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640222; https://academic.oup.com/jee/article/115/5/1442/6594672; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jee/toac078; https://academic.oup.com/jee/article-abstract/115/5/1442/6594672?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know