Gene-Nutrient Interactions and DNA Methylation
The Journal of Nutrition, ISSN: 0022-3166, Vol: 132, Issue: 8, Page: 2382S-2387S
2002
- 221Citations
- 86Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations221
- Citation Indexes221
- 221
- CrossRef186
- Captures86
- Readers86
- 86
Article Description
Many micronutrients and vitamins are critical for DNA synthesis/repair and maintenance of DNA methylation patterns. Folate has been most extensively investigated in this regard because of its unique function as methyl donor for nucleotide synthesis and biological methylation. Cell culture and animal and human studies showed that deficiency of folate induces disruption of DNA as well as alterations in DNA methylation status. Animal models of methyl deficiency demonstrated an even stronger cause-and-effect relationship than did studies using a folate-deficient diet alone. Such observations imply that the adverse effects of inadequate folate status on DNA metabolism are mostly due to the impairment of methyl supply. Recently, an interaction was observed between folate status and a common mutation in the gene encoding for methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, an essential enzyme in one-carbon metabolism, in determining genomic DNA methylation. This finding suggests that the interaction between a nutritional status with a genetic polymorphism can modulate gene expression through DNA methylation, especially when such polymorphism limits the methyl supply. DNA methylation, both genome-wide and gene-specific, is of particular interest for the study of cancer, aging and other conditions related to cell-cycle regulation and tissue-specific differentiation, because it affects gene expression without permanent alterations in DNA sequence such as mutations or allele deletions. Understanding the patterns of DNA methylation through the interaction with nutrients is fundamental, not only to provide pathophysiological explanations for the development of certain diseases, but also to improve the knowledge of possible prevention strategies by modifying a nutritional status in at-risk populations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022316622153897; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jn/132.8.2382s; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0036328453&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12163697; https://academic.oup.com/jn/article/132/8/2382S-2387S/4687586; http://academic.oup.com/jn/article-pdf/132/8/2382S/23546559/4w08t20s2382.pdf; https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022316622153897; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jn/132.8.2382s
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know