Thulium laser vaporesection of prostates with volume exceeding 100 cm as an alternative to HoLEP and ThuLEP
Journal of Surgical Case Reports, ISSN: 2042-8812, Vol: 2023, Issue: 5, Page: rjac441
2023
- 8Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures8
- Readers8
Article Description
The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of thulium laser vaporesection of prostates with volume exceeding 100 cm. In the present prospective study, patients with infra-vesical urinary obstruction due to a prostate with volume exceeding 100 cm underwent endoscopic vaporesection using thulium laser. In this procedure, prostate chips were resected without morcellation. The technical aspects of surgery, admission time, post-operative catheter time and post-operative complications were analyzed. Flowmetry was performed combined with prostatic ultrasound in the follow-up. Between March 2010 and November 2018, 156 cases with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH; volume >100 cm) were treated. The mean patient age was 67.8 years (48.4–86.6 years), and the mean prostatic volume was 137 cm (100–436 cm). The mean length of hospitalization was 1.48 days (1–8 days), and the mean post-operative catheter time was 5.1 (1–17). Three cases (1.9%) required readmission due to hematuria. The mean follow-up time was 31.2 months (standard deviation = 27.7). Urethral stricture was observed in 14 cases (9%), with bulbar urethra being the most frequent finding. Urinary tract infection was observed in 11 cases (7.1%), and urinary incontinence was observed in 5 cases. The mean peak urinary flow at 12 and 24 months was 26.9 ± 12.5 and 23.9 ± 11.7 ml/s, respectively, and the mean urinary flow during the final follow-up at 41 months was 21.6 ml/s. Thulium laser vaporesection is a valid alternative to open prostatectomy, HoLEP and ThuLEP in patients with large BPH. Urinary flow remained elevated throughout the follow-up.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85162055217&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjac441; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37255953; https://academic.oup.com/jscr/article/doi/10.1093/jscr/rjac441/7185488; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjac441; https://academic.oup.com/jscr/article/2023/5/rjac441/7185488
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know