Implications of Einstein–Maxwell dilaton–axion gravity from the black hole continuum spectrum
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, ISSN: 1365-2966, Vol: 500, Issue: 1, Page: 481-492
2021
- 12Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
String inspired models can serve as potential candidates to replace general relativity (GR) in the high-energy/high-curvature regime where quantum gravity is expected to play a vital role. Such models not only subsume the ultraviolet nature of gravity but also exhibit promising prospects in resolving issues like dark matter and dark energy, which cannot be adequately addressed within the framework of GR. The Einstein–Maxwell dilaton–axion (EMDA) theory that is central to this work is one such string inspired model arising in the low energy effective action of the heterotic string theory with interesting implications in inflationary cosmology and in the late-time acceleration of the Universe. It is therefore important to survey the role of such a theory in explaining astrophysical observations, e.g. the continuum spectrum of black holes which is expected to hold a wealth of information regarding the background metric. The Kerr–Sen space–time corresponds to the exact, stationary, and axisymmetric black hole solution in EMDA gravity, possessing dilatonic charge and angular momentum originating from the axionic field. In this work, we compute the theoretical spectrum from the accretion disc around quasars in the Kerr–Sen background assuming the thin accretion disc model due to Novikov and Thorne. This is then used to evaluate the theoretical estimates of optical luminosity for a sample of eighty Palomar Green quasars which are subsequently compared with the available observations. Our results based on χ analysis indicate that the dilaton parameter r ∼ 0.2 is favoured by optical observations of quasars which is further corroborated by other error estimators e.g. the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency, the index of agreement and their modified versions. We further report that strong dilaton charges (r > 1.6) are disfavoured by quasar optical data and the spins associated with the quasars are also estimated.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85097475097&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3232; https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/500/1/481/5928575; http://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/500/1/481/34261119/staa3232.pdf; http://academic.oup.com/mnras/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/mnras/staa3232/33926952/staa3232.pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3232
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know