Single-station meteor detection filtering using machine learning on MOROI data
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, ISSN: 1365-2966, Vol: 518, Issue: 2, Page: 2810-2824
2023
- 1Citations
- 1Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Findings from Romanian Academy in Machine Learning Reported (Single-station Meteor Detection Filtering Using Machine Learning On Moroi Data)
2023 FEB 13 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at Robotics & Machine Learning Daily News Daily News -- A new study on
Article Description
Nowadays, extensive data are collected in an automated regime. Combining this, with the increase in accessible computational power, led to large-scale implementations of machine learning (ML). This is also the case of meteor science, where object detection often requires tracking of a moving light source between frames, and the number of false positives can be up to an order of magnitude higher than true meteoric phenomena. While spatiotemporal coincidence of events recorded by close, multiple cameras can eliminate most of the false positives, single-station detections in some camera networks are currently discarded. In this paper, we explore a set of ML models aiming to find an optimal method for re-analysis of this single-station observations, in order to identify and extract real meteors. A set of 15 ML models were trained on features extracted from the meteor movement. Upon testing, we found a top accuracy score of 98,2 per cent, and a recall (i.e. percentage of meteors correctly classified) score of 96 per cent for the best performing models. When combined with the spatiotemporal coincidence of the detection, the recall increases to 99.92 per cent. These 15 ML techniques were selected according to their ability classify tabular data, hence the bundle can be applied to other studies. The same goes for the computed features, which are independent on the camera configuration, thus, the process can be scaled and applied to other networks. These methods are to be implemented to re-analyze the events recorded by the larger, FRIPON network.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know