From X-rays to physical parameters: a comprehensive analysis of thermal tidal disruption event X-ray spectra
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, ISSN: 1365-2966, Vol: 519, Issue: 4, Page: 5828-5847
2023
- 13Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
We perform a comprehensive analysis of a population of 19 X-ray bright tidal disruption events (TDEs), fitting their X-ray spectra with a new, physically self-consistent, relativistic accretion disc model. Not all of the TDEs inhabit regions of parameter space where the model is valid, or have sufficient data for a detailed analysis, and physically interpretable parameters for a subsample of 11 TDEs are determined. These sources have thermal (power-law free) X-ray spectra. The radial sizes measured from these spectra lie at values consistent with the innermost stable circular orbit of black holes with masses given by the MBH-σ relationship, and can be used as an independent measurement of MBH. The bolometric disc luminosity can also be inferred from X-ray data. All of the TDEs have luminosities that are sub-Eddington (Lbol, disc ≳ Ledd), and larger than the typical hard-state transitional luminosity of X-ray binary discs (Lbol, disc ≳ 0.01Ledd). The peak bolometric luminosity is found to be linearly correlated with the MBH-σ mass. The TDE X-ray-to-bolometric correction can reach values up to ∼100, and grows exponentially at late times, resolving the missing energy problem. We show that the peak disc luminosities of some TDEs are smaller than their observed optical luminosities, implying that not all of the early time optical emission can be sourced from reprocessed disc emission. Our results are supportive of the hypothesis that thermal X-ray bright TDEs are in accretion states analogous to the 'soft' accretion state of X-ray binaries, and that black hole accretion processes are scale (mass) invariant.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know