Constraints from growth-rate data on some coupled dark energy models mimicking a ΛCDM expansion
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, ISSN: 1365-2966, Vol: 460, Issue: 2, Page: 1863-1868
2016
- 10Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The ΛCDM expansion can be mimicked by dark energy coupled to matter. In this case, the equation of state w and coupling Q of this coupled dark energy cannot be constrained by observations of the Hubble function alone. In this article, we determine the constraints on two such coupled dark energy models, considering some current and forecast Euclid-like growth-rate data and assuming the prior on the ΛCDM dark matter density parameter today, Ω = 0.295 ± 0.04. The first model is defined by a constant equation of state. We find that, at 2σ, w=-1.02 and the coupling function Q today is QH=0.057-, with H0 the Hubble constant. The second model is defined by a varying equation of state w=w-w ln (1+z), with z the redshift and w ,w ) two constants. We find that, at 2σ, wa=-0.99, w b}=-0.04 and QH=0.0002. These constraints on coupled dark energy agree with a ΛCDM model but are too poor to discard with confidence coupled dark energy different from a vacuum but mimicking a ΛCDM expansion.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84983050023&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1087; https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/mnras/stw1087; http://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/460/2/1863/8116869/stw1087.pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1087; https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/460/2/1863/2609080
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know