The mass-metallicity and the fundamental metallicity relation revisited on a fully T-based abundance scale for galaxies
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, ISSN: 1365-2966, Vol: 491, Issue: 1, Page: 944-964
2020
- 242Citations
- 77Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
The relationships between stellar mass, gas-phase metallicity and star-formation rate (i.e. the mass-metallicity, MZR, and the fundamental metallicity relation, FMR) in the local Universe are revisited by fully anchoring the metallicity determination for SDSS galaxies on the T abundance scale defined exploiting the strong-line metallicity calibrations presented by Curti et al. Self-consistent metallicity measurements allow a more unbiased assessment of the scaling relations involving M, Z and SFR, which provide powerful constraints for the chemical evolution models. We parametrize the MZR with a new functional form that allows us to better characterize the turnover mass. The slope and saturation metallicity are in good agreement with previous determinations of the MZR based on the T method, while showing significantly lower normalization compared to those based on photoionization models. The Z-SFR dependence at fixed stellar mass is also investigated, being particularly evident for highly star-forming galaxies, where the scatter in metallicity is reduced up to a factor of ∼30 per cent. A new parametrization of the FMR is given by explicitly introducing the SFR dependence of the turnover mass into the MZR. The residual scatter in metallicity for the global galaxy population around the new FMR is 0.054 dex. The new FMR presented in this work represents a useful local benchmark to compare theoretical predictions and observational studies (of both local and high-redshift galaxies) whose metallicity measurements are tied to the abundance scale defined by the T method, hence allowing proper assessment of its evolution with cosmic time.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85079443888&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2910; https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/491/1/944/5638748; http://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/491/1/944/31094303/stz2910.pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2910
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know