Comparison of the clinical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty in osseous ankylosed and non-ankylosed knees using propensity-score matching
Modern Rheumatology, ISSN: 1439-7609, Vol: 34, Issue: 1, Page: 226-237
2024
- 1Citations
- 7Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
Studies in the Area of Arthroplasty Reported from Saga University (Comparison of the clinical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty in osseous ankylosed and non-ankylosed knees using propensity-score matching)
2022 DEC 28 (NewsRx) -- By a News Reporter-Staff News Editor at NewsRx Medical Devices Daily -- Researchers detail new data in arthroplasty. According to
Article Description
Objectives: Few studies have compared the clinical outcomes and complications of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in patients with and without osseous ankylosed knees. Thus, we investigated the clinical outcomes and complications of TKA in patients with osseous ankylosed knees using a propensity-score matching method. Methods: Thirteen knees in the osseous ankylosed-knees group and 13 knees in the non-ankylosed-knees group were included after excluding those with less than 2 years of follow-up or a lack of data and after propensity-score matching. The American Knee Society Score-knee (AKSS-knee), AKSS-function, knee-flexion angle, knee-extension angle, knee range of motion (ROM) before and after TKA, and the number of knees with postoperative complications were evaluated as primary outcomes. Results: The AKSS-knee, AKSS-function, knee-flexion angle, and knee ROM in the osseous ankylosed-knees group after TKA were significantly lower than those in the non-ankylosed-knees group. The knee-extension angle after TKA and number of knees with postoperative complications within 2 years were not significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions: The clinical results of TKA in patients with osseous ankylosed knees were inferior to those in patients with non-ankylosed knees.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85176741519&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mr/roac144; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36508296; https://academic.oup.com/mr/article/34/1/226/6889107; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mr/roac144; https://academic.oup.com/mr/article-abstract/34/1/226/6889107?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know