Predictive Value of Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings for Survival and Local Recurrence in Patients Undergoing en Bloc Resection of Sacral Chordomas
Clinical Neurosurgery, ISSN: 1524-4040, Vol: 85, Issue: 6, Page: 834-842
2019
- 10Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations10
- Citation Indexes10
- 10
- CrossRef9
- Captures16
- Readers16
- 16
Article Description
BACKGROUND: Few studies have assessed the prognostic importance of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan findings in patients undergoing en bloc resection of sacral chordomas. OBJECTIVE: To (1) report in-depth imaging characteristics of sacral chordomas, (2) describe the patterns of local and distant recurrence, and (3) determine imaging predictors of overall survival (OS) and local recurrence (LR). METHODS: This retrospective case series was obtained from a prospectively maintained spine database from 1995 to 2016. All patients underwent en bloc resection of sacral chordomas. Detailed demographic, outcome, and MRI data were collected. A survival analysis was completed with multivariable cox regression to assess the impact of MRI findings on OS and LR. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients underwent en bloc resection of sacral chordoma with preoperative MRI scans. Tumor characteristics included lobulated: (93%) and soft tissue tail (54%). The following areas had tumor invasion lobulated: Sacroiliac (SI) joint (15%), ilium (5%), piriformis (61%), gluteus (46%), subcutaneous fat (32%), and lumbosacral venous plexus (22%). After multivariable analysis, only subcutaneous fat extension was an independent predictor of decreased OS (hazard ratio 5.30, 95% confidence interval 1.47-19.19, P =. 011). Though not significant after multivariable analysis, the following factors were significant predictors of LR after univariate logrank testing: Above the L5/S1 disc space (P =. 004), SI joint invasion (P =. 036), and piriformis extension (P =. 022). CONCLUSION: The presence of subcutaneous fat extension was an independent predictor of decreased OS. Other MRI findings with potential for future evaluation include size, presence of soft tissue tail, extension above L5/S1, and SI joint and piriformis invasion.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85076376195&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy578; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30541143; https://journals.lww.com/10.1093/neuros/nyy578; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy578; https://academic.oup.com/neurosurgery/article-abstract/85/6/834/5239877?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know