Curvature perturbations and anomaly explain dark energy
Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, ISSN: 2050-3911, Vol: 2021, Issue: 10
2021
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
We investigate the history of dark energy to explain the present magnitude. We assume the dark energy is the residual cosmological constant. The most important channel in the reheating process is gluon pair production by the quantumchromodynamic trace anomaly. We argue that dark energy decays rapidly by gluon pair emissions during the reheating and after the big bang. The reheating temperature is determined by the decay width of dark energy, $\Gamma$, and the Planck mass, $M_\mathrm{p}$, as $\sqrt{M_\mathrm{P}\Gamma} \sim 106 \, GeV$. This is a consequence of Friedmann's equation and the equilibrium condition $\Gamma\sim H$. As the Universe cools below the hadronic scale, the dark energy density is almost frozen. Nevertheless, the dark energy further decreases by emitting two photons. We have estimated the current decay rate of dark energy from the quantum electrodynamic trace anomaly. The consistent solution of the Friedmann equation is in excellent agreement with the observations. The suppression factor of the dark energy scale is the product of the fine structure constant, $\alpha$, and the curvature perturbation, $P$: $10{-30}=(\alpha2P/4\pi)2$. We argue that the conformal symmetry breaking in both ultraviolet and infrared are necessary unless dark energy is subtracted. We also investigate leptogenesis by adding massive right-handed neutrinos: realistic leptogenesis takes place during the reheating process.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85119607849&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptab083; https://academic.oup.com/ptep/article/doi/10.1093/ptep/ptab083/6407156; http://academic.oup.com/ptep/article-pdf/2021/10/103B01/41023233/ptab083.pdf; http://academic.oup.com/ptep/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/ptep/ptab083/40795287/ptab083.pdf; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptab083; https://academic.oup.com/ptep/article/2021/10/103B01/6407156
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know