PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

The effect of group-based cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A randomized controlled trial

Rheumatology (United Kingdom), ISSN: 1462-0332, Vol: 62, Issue: 3, Page: 1097-1107
2023
  • 11
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 51
    Captures
  • 1
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Most Recent News

Group therapy for insomnia studied in rheumatoid arthritis patients

For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and insomnia, nurse-led group-based cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) does not have an impact on sleep efficiency measured immediately after the intervention, but does improve patient-reported key secondary sleep and RA outcomes, according to a study published online Aug. 11 in Rheumatology.

Article Description

Objectives: The primary objective was to compare the effect of cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) to usual care on sleep efficiency, measured by polysomnography (PSG) immediately after the intervention at week 7. Secondary objectives included comparing the longer-term effect on sleep- and RA-related outcomes at week 26. Methods: In a randomized controlled trial using a parallel group design, the experimental intervention was 6 weeks' nurse-led group-based CBT-I; the comparator was usual care. Analyses were based on the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle; missing data were statistically modelled using repeated-measures linear mixed effects models adjusted for the level at baseline. Results: The ITT population consisted of 62 patients (89% women), with an average age of 58 years and an average sleep efficiency of 83.1%. At primary end point, sleep efficiency was 88.7% in the CBT-I group, compared with 83.7% in the control group (difference: 5.03 [95% CI -0.37, 10.43]; P = 0.068) measured by PSG at week 7. Key secondary outcomes measured with PSG had not improved at week 26. However, for all the patient-reported key secondary sleep- and RA-related outcomes, there were statistically highly significant differences between CBT-I and usual care (P < 0.0001), e.g. insomnia (Insomnia Severity Index: -9.85 [95% CI -11.77, -7.92]) and the RA impact of disease (RAID: -1.36 [95% CI -1.92, -0.80]) at week 26. Conclusion: Nurse-led group-based CBT-I did not lead to an effect on sleep efficiency objectively measured with PSG. However, CBT-I showed improvement on all patient-reported key secondary sleep- and RA-related outcomes measured at week 26. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03766100.

Bibliographic Details

Latocha, Kristine M; Løppenthin, Katrine B; Østergaard, Mikkel; Jennum, Poul J; Hetland, Merete L; Røgind, Henrik; Lundbak, Tine; Midtgaard, Julie; Christensen, Robin; Esbensen, Bente A

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Medicine

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know