TEMPORAL VARIATION OF POST-ACCIDENT I IN ATMOSPHERIC PARTICULATE MATTER COLLECTED FROM AN EVACUATED AREA OF FUKUSHIMA PREFECTURE, JAPAN
Radiation Protection Dosimetry, ISSN: 1742-3406, Vol: 198, Issue: 13-15, Page: 1143-1149
2022
- 1Citations
- 4Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
To understand the behavior of atmospheric 129I that originated from the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP) accident, activity concentrations of 129I in samples of atmospheric particulate matter (PM), comprising coarse (>1.1 μm) and fine (<1.1 μm) fractions (separated using a single stage impactor), were measured on a nearly monthly basis from October 2012 to October 2014 at a site in an area evacuated after the FDNPP accident. Total atmospheric 129I activity concentrations in PM at the site ranged between 0.15 and 2.17 nBq m-3. Specific activity concentration of 129I in total atmospheric PM ranged between 40.8 and 336 mBq kg-1, with a mean and standard deviation of 142 and 77.6 mBq kg-1, respectively. The specific activity in PM tended to be higher than not only the background values reported from soil collected before the FDNPP accident but also than those reported from the contaminated soil after the accident (range: 1.6-57 mBq kg-1; mean and standard deviation: 10.6 and 12.3 mBq kg-1, respectively). Total 129I/127I atomic ratios in PM ranged from 2.0 × 10-8 to 59.8 × 10-8, with a mean and standard deviation of 15.0 × 10-8 and 14.4 × 10-8, respectively. These ratios were generally lower than those of the contaminated soil collected after the FDNPP accident (range: 4.9 × 10-8-443 × 10-8; mean and standard deviation: 74.2 × 10-8 and 85.4 × 10-8, respectively). The 129I concentration and 129I/127I atomic ratio in atmospheric PM showed different characteristics from that of contaminated soils, suggesting that the presence of other atmospheric PMs plays a more important role as the host for 129I.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85138127141&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncac081; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36083759; https://academic.oup.com/rpd/article/198/13-15/1143/6694913; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncac081; https://academic.oup.com/rpd/article-abstract/198/13-15/1143/6694913?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know