COMPARISON OF OSL AND TL DOSEMETERS WITH DATA COLLECTED AT THE MT25 CYCLIC ELECTRON ACCELERATOR
Radiation Protection Dosimetry, ISSN: 1742-3406, Vol: 198, Issue: 9-11, Page: 670-674
2022
- 1Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Article Description
The Microtron MT25 is a cyclic electron accelerator with a Kapitza resonator, maximum beam energy of 25 MeV, standard repetition frequency of 423 Hz, pulse length of 3.5 μs and mean current of 30 μA. Studies at conventional particle accelerators allow to understand the response of dosemeters in known and controllable radiation fields. Subsequently, it is possible to develop models and predict their behavior in complex radiation fields, such as those generated at laser and FLASH facilities. Therefore, response of thermally and optically stimulated luminescence detectors outside of the beam was studied at the Microtron MT25. The detectors were placed on a Plexiglas phantom inside a lead and iron bunker to shield-off background radiation. In addition, GAFChromic™ films and track detectors were used. Two irradiations were performed: with and without an 8-cm thick polyethylene moderator. This paper presents a comparison of the responses of the different detection systems.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85137124612&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncac117; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36005969; https://academic.oup.com/rpd/article/198/9-11/670/6672990; https://zenodo.org/records/7660928; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncac117; https://academic.oup.com/rpd/article-abstract/198/9-11/670/6672990?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know