A toxicology for the 21st century - Mapping the road ahead
Toxicological Sciences, ISSN: 1096-6080, Vol: 109, Issue: 1, Page: 18-23
2009
- 84Citations
- 97Captures
- 4Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations84
- Citation Indexes84
- 84
- CrossRef49
- Captures97
- Readers97
- 97
- Mentions4
- News Mentions2
- 2
- References2
- 2
Most Recent News
Has Toxicity Testing Moved into the 21st Century? A Survey and Analysis of Perceptions in the Field of Toxicology
Virginia Zaunbrecher, 1,2 Elizabeth Beryt, 3 Daniela Parodi, 4 Donatello Telesca, 5 Joseph Doherty, 2 Timothy Malloy, 1,2,6 and Patrick Allard 1,4,6 Author Affiliations open
Article Description
The landmark publication by the National Research Council putting forward a vision of a toxicology for the 21st century in 2007 has created an atmosphere of departure in our field. The alliances formed, symposia and meetings held and the articles following are remarkable, indicating that this is an idea whose time has come. Most of the discussion centers on the technical opportunities to map pathways of toxicity and the financing of the program. Here, the other part of the work ahead shall be discussed, that is, the focus is on regulatory implementation once the technological challenges are managed, but we are well aware that the technical aspects of what the National Academy of Science report suggests still need to be addressed: A series of challenges are put forward which we will face in addition to finding a technical solution (and its funding) to set this vision into practice. This includes the standardization and quality assurance of novel methodologies, their formal validation, their integration into test strategies including threshold setting and finally a global acceptance and implementation. This will require intense conceptual steering to have all pieces of the puzzle come together. © The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. All rights reserved.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=65549145511&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfp059; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19357069; https://academic.oup.com/toxsci/article/1675018/A; https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfp059; https://academic.oup.com/toxsci/article/109/1/18/1675018
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know